360压缩_360推出的免费解压缩软件_360安全中心:2021-5-29 · 360压缩是360推出的免费解压缩软件,360压缩快速轻巧、兼容性好、永久免费。360压缩内置云安全引擎,可众检测木马,更安全
Pornhub的VPN来了 - 云+社区 - 腾讯云:2021-5-25 · Pornhub的VPN来了。这款应用软件将为上述移动平台免费提供,但桌面用户却需要支付一定的费用。罗曼在其中写道:“比如你在苹果的App Store和谷歌的Google Play中看到的那些免费版VPN软件,它伔都会去分析你的浏览习惯,然后把这些数据卖给 ...
Note: most of the data that follows was gathered a few weeks ago, building off Mercurial revision 70f8ce3e2d394a8c4d08725b108003844abbbff9 of mozilla-central.
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
The old “fast” build machine had a i7-870, with 4 cores, 8 threads running at 2.93GHz, turbo at 3.6GHz, and 16GiB RAM. The new machine has a Threadripper 3970X, with 32 cores, 64 threads running at 3.7GHz, turbo at 4.5GHz (rarely reached to be honest), and 128GiB RAM (unbuffered ECC).
Let’s compare build times between them, at the same level of parallelism:
That is 63 minutes for the i7-870 vs. 26 for the Threadripper, with a twist: the Threadripper was explicitly configured to use 4 physical cores (with 2 threads each) so as to be fair to the poor i7-870.
Assuming the i7 maxed out at its base clock, and the Threadripper at turbo speed (which it actually doesn’t, but it’s closer to the truth than the base clock is with a eighth of the cores activated), the speed-up from the difference in frequency alone would make the build 1.5 times faster, but we got close to 2.5 times faster.
But that doesn’t account for other factors we’ll explore further below.
Before going there, let’s look at what unleashing the full power of the Threadripper brings to the table:
Yes, that is 5 minutes for the Threadripper 3970X, when using all its cores and threads.
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
The old machine was using spinning disks in RAID 1. I can’t really test much faster SSDs on that machine because I don’t have any that would fit, and the machine is now dismantled, but I was able to try the spinning disks on the Threadripper.
Using spinning disks instead of modern solid-state makes the build almost 3 times as slow! (or an addition of almost 10 minutes). And while I kind of went overboard with this new machine by setting up not one but two NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDs in RAID1, I also slowed them down by using Full Disk Encryption, but it doesn’t matter, because I get the same build times (within noise) if I put everything in memory (because I can).
It would be interesting to get more data with different generations of SSDs, though (SATA ones may still have a visible overhead, for instance).
Pornhub推出VPN服务-月光微博客:2021-6-10 · 全球最大的色情视频网站 Pornhub 推出了自己的 VPN 服务,这个名为 VPNhub 的服务可在 Mac、Windows、Android 和 iOS 平台上使用,在15个国家有1000台服务器,在美国的价格为每月 12.99 美元。 Pornhub 的副总裁 Corey Price 在一份声明中 ...
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
My most recent laptop is a 3.5 years old Dell XPS13 9360, that came with a i7-7500U (2 cores, 4 threads, because that’s all you could get in the 13″ form factor back then; 2.7GHz, 3.5GHz turbo), and 16GiB RAM.
A more recent 13″ laptop would be the Apple Macbook Pro 13″ Mid 2024, sporting an i7-8569U (4 cores, 8 threads, 2.8GHz, 4.7GHz turbo), and 16GiB RAM. I don’t own one, but Mozilla’s procurement system contains build times for it (although I don’t know what changeset that corresponds to, or what compilers were used ; also, the OS is different).
The XPS13 being old, it is subject to thermal throttling, making it slower than it should be, but it wouldn’t beat the 10 years old desktop anyway. Macbook Pros tend to get into these thermal issues after a while too.
I’ve relied on laptops for a long time. My previous laptop before this XPS was another XPS, that is now about 6 to 7 years old, and while the newer one had more RAM, it was barely getting better build times compared to the older one when I switched. The evolution of laptop performance has been underwelming for a long time, but things finally changed last year. At long last.
I wish I had numbers with a more recent laptop under the same OS as the XPS for fairer comparison. Or with the more recent larger laptops that sport even more cores, especially the fancy ones with Ryzen processors.
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
As seen above, my laptop was not really a great experience. Neither was my faster machine. When I needed power, I actually turned to AWS EC2. That’s not exactly cheap for long term use, but I only used it for a couple hours at a time, in relatively rare occasions.
PPT模板_PPT模版免费下载_免费PPT模板下载 -【第一PPT】:2 天前 · 第一PPT模板网提供各类PPT模板免费下载,PPT背景图,PPT素材,PPT背景,免费PPT模板下载,PPT图表,精美PPT下载,PPT课件下载,PPT背景图片免费下载;
Speaking of virtualization, one might wonder what kind of overhead it has, and as far as building Firefox goes, the difference between c5d.metal (without) and c5d.24xlarge (with), is well within noise.
Keepers of the Food is Closed - Keepers of the Food ...:2021-5-26 · vmess cli vpm百度云资源 npv 破解版ssr安卓客户端 680196.com 下载永久免费加速器 佛跳墙外网 佛跳墙v、 汉化VPN ao3开梯子 ssrconnectpro安卓版本下载 上外教务系统 v2ray 添加伕理 E站配额多久恢复 兰色的灯 免费ss几点 2bss456 全局小飞机
There are EPYC-based m5a instances, but they are not Zen 2 and have lower frequencies, so they’re not all that good. Who knows when Amazon will deliver their Zen 2 offerings.
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
The Firefox build system is not perfect, and the number of jobs it’s allowed to run at once can have an influence on the overall build times, even on the same machine. This can somehow be observed on the results on AWS above, but testing different values of -jn
on a machine with a large number of cores is another way to investigate how well the build system scales. Here it is, on the Threadripper 3970X:
Let’s pause a moment to appreciate that this machine can build slightly faster, with only 2 cores, than the old machine could with 4 cores and 8 threads.
You may also notice that the build times at -j6
and -j8
are better than the -j8
build time given earlier. More on that further below.
The data, however, is somehow skewed as far as getting a clear picture of how well the Firefox build system scales, because the less cores and threads are being used, the faster those cores can get, thanks to “Turbo”. As mentioned earlier, the base frequency for the processor is 3.7GHz, but it can go up to 4.5GHz. In practice, /proc/cpuinfo
doesn’t show much more than 4.45GHz when few cores are used, but on the opposite end, would frequently show 3.8GHz when all of them are used. Which means all the values in that last graph are not entirely comparable to each other.
So let’s see how things go with Turbo disabled (note, though, that I didn’t disable dynamic CPU frequency scaling):
The ideal scaling (red line) is the build time at -j1
divided by the n in -jn
.
So, at the scale of the graph above, things look like there’s some kind of constant overhead (the parts of the build that aren’t parallelized all that well), and a part that is within what you’d expect for parallelization, except above -j32
(we’ll get to that last part further down).
Based on the above, let’s assume a modeled build time of the form O + P / n
. We can find some O
and P
that makes the values for e.g. -j1
and pornvpn免费下载
correct. That works out to be 1.9534 + 146.294 / n
(or, in time format: 1:57.2 + 2:26:17.64 / n
).
Let’s see how it fares:
The red line is how far from the ideal case (-j1
/n) the actual data is, in percent from the ideal case. At -j32
, the build time is slightly more than 1.4 times what it ideally would be. At -j24
, about 1.3 times, etc.
The blue line is how far from the modeled case the actual data is, in percent from the modeled case. The model is within 3% of reality (without Turbo) until -j32
.
And above pornvpn免费下载
, things blow up. And the reason is obvious: the CPU only has 32 actual cores. Which brings us to…
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
Ever since the Pentium 4, many (and now most) modern desktop and laptop processors have had some sort of Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) technology. The underlying principle is that CPUs are waiting for something a lot of the time (usually data in RAM), and that they could actually be executing something else when that happens.
From the software perspective, though, it only appears to be more cores than there physically are. So on a processor with 2 threads per core like the Threadripper 3970X, that means the OS exposes 64 “virtual” cores instead of the 32 physical ones.
When the workload doesn’t require all the “virtual” cores, the OS will schedule code to run on virtual cores that don’t share the same physical core, so as to get the best of one’s machine.
This is why -jn
on a machine that has n real cores or more will have better build times than -jn
on a machine with less cores, but at least n virtual cores.
This was already exposed in some way above, where the first -j8
build time shown was worse than the subsequent ones. That one was taken while disabling all physical cores but 4, and still keeping 2 threads per core. Let’s compare that with similar number of real cores:
As we can see, 4 cores with 8 threads is better than 4 cores, but it doesn’t beat 6 physical cores. Which kind of matches the general wisdom that SMT brings an extra 30% performance.
By the way, this being all on a Zen 2 processor, I’d expect a pornvpn免费下载 to provide similar build times to that 4 cores 8 threads case.
Let’s look at 16 cores and 32 threads:
Similar observation: obviously better than 16 cores alone, but worse than 24 physical cores. And again, this being all on a Zen 2 processor, I’d expect a Ryzen 9 3950X to provide similar build times to the 16 cores and 32 threads case.
Based on the above, I’d estimate a Threadripper 3960X to have build times close to those of 32 real cores on the 3970X (32 cores is 33% more cores than 24).
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
vpn.jstv.com:vpn.jstv.com
Things get different if you build for a different target (say, Firefox for Windows), or under a different operating system.
Our baseline on this machine is the Firefox for Linux64 build is 5 minutes. Building Firefox for Windows (as a cross-compilation) takes 40 more seconds (5:40), because of building some extra Windows-specific stuff.
A similar Firefox for Windows build, natively, on a fresh Windows 10 install takes … more than 12 minutes! Until you realize you can disable Windows Defender for the source and build tree, at which point it only takes 7:27. That’s still noticeably slower than cross-compiling, but not as catastrophic as when the antivirus is enabled.
Recent versions of Windows come with a Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL), which allows to run native Linux programs unmodified. There are now actually two versions of WSL. One emulates Linux system calls (WSL1), and the other runs a real Linux kernel in a virtual machine (WSL2). With a Debian GNU/Linux 10 system under WSL1, building Firefox for Linux64 takes 6:25, while it takes 5:41 under WSL2, so WSL2 is definitely faster, but still not close to metal.
Edit: Ironically, it’s very much possible that a cross-compiled Firefox for Windows build in WSL2 would be faster than a native Firefox for Windows build on Windows (but I haven’t tried).
电脑版vpn:2021-8-13 · 董事长李金元先生简介 新起点、新机制、新模式、新未来 2021-01 26 先生。李金元,天石集团董事长兼总裁,天石锦绣爱情基金总裁。1958年生于河北省苍县,毕业于南开大学国际商学院,是一名 …
Let’s recap as a graph:
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
All the build times mentioned so far have been building off mozilla-central without any tweaks. That’s actually not how a real Firefox release is built, which enables more optimizations. Without even going to the full set of optimizations that go into building a real Firefox Nightly (including Link Time Optimizations and Profile Guided Optimizations), simply switching --enable-release
on will up the optimization game.
Building on Mozilla automation also enables things that don’t happen during what we call “local developer builds”, such as dumping debug info for use to process crash reports, linking a second libxul library for some unit tests, the full packaging of Firefox, the preparation of archives that will be used to run tests, etc.
As of writing, most Firefox builds on Mozilla automation happen on c5d.4xlarge (or similarly sized) AWS EC2 instances. They benefit from the use of a shared compilation cache, so their build times are very noisy, as they depend on the cache hit rate.
So, I took some Linux64 optimized build that runs on automation (not one with LTO or PGO), and ran its full script, with the shared compilation cache disabled, on corresponding and larger AWS EC2 instances, as well as the Threadripper:
The immediate observation is that these builds scale much less gracefully than a “local developer build” does, and there are multiple factors that come into play, but the common thread is that parts of the build that don’t run during those “local developer builds” are slow and not well parallelized. Work is in progress to make things better, though.
vpn上网:2021-6-5 · vpn上网 免费ip伕理免费软件哪好 自己搭建vpsxbox 去哪里找梯子 2021 酸酸乳 六尺巷5破解版 爬墙后好玩的app miui10梯子不能用了 安卓上网 i7加速器安卓版下载2021 蓝灯lantern官网 怎么fan墙 哪vpn 玩uu账号密码共享 几鸡跑路 vps可众开多少用户 hediu WWW.BET626365.COM 坚果怎么做 老王佛系免费下载 蓝奏云 学习 ...
All in all, it’s not all that great to go with bigger instances, because they cost more but won’t compensate by doing as many more builds in the same amount of time… except if doing more builds in parallel, which is being experimented with.
On the Threadripper 3970X, I can do 2 “local developer builds” in parallel in less time than doing them one after the other (1:20 less, so 8:40 instead of 10 minutes). Even with -j64
. Heck, I can do 4 builds in parallel at -j16
in 16 minutes and 15 seconds, which is somewhere between a single -j12
and single -j8
, which is where one -j16
with 8 threads and 16 threads should be at. That doesn’t seem all that useful, until you think of it this way: I can locally build for multiple platforms at once in well under 20 minutes. All on one machine, from one source tree.
中国移动宽带测速官网2- 爬墙专用加速器
We looked at various ways build times can vary depending on different hardware (and even software) configurations. Note this only covers hardware parameters that didn’t require reboots to test out (e.g. this excludes variations like RAM speed ; and yes, this means there are ways to disable turbo, cores and threads without fiddling with the BIOS, I’ll probably write a separate blog post about this).
Fast, Secure & Anonymous VPN | Astrill VPN:Protect your privacy & access media content with no regional restrictions with our fast, secure & anonymous VPN. Strict no-logs policy, torrents supported. Strong encryption with 330 servers in …
If you’re on the market for a new machine, I’d advise getting a powerful desktop machine (based on a 3950X, a 3960X or a pornvpn免费下载) rather than refreshing your aging laptop. I don’t think any laptop currently available would get below 15 minutes build times. And those that can build in less than 20 minutes probably cost more than a desktop machine that would build in well under half that. Edit: Also, pick a fast NVMe SSD that can sustain tons of IOPS.
Of course, if you use some caching method, build times will be much better even on a slower machine, but even with a cache, it happens quite often that you get a lot of cache misses that cancel out the benefit of the cache. YMMV.
You may also have legitimate concerns that rr doesn’t work yet, but when I need it, I can pull my old Intel-based laptop. rr actually works well enough on Ryzen for single-threaded workloads, and I haven’t needed to debug Firefox itself with rr recently, so I haven’t actually pulled the old laptop a lot (although I have been using rr and Pernosco).
2024-05-28 17:02:38+0900
p.m.o | 5 Comments »